Simon Everett, Ltd.

Simon Everett is an analytic design firm. We structure and implement analytic engagements to help government agencies, businesses, and non-profits solve problems, large and small. Whether our clients seek to create capabilities, improve processes, or inform decisions, we offer the proven ability to address their needs. Our consultative approach blends analytic agility with interdisciplinary expertise to produce functionally and aesthetically impactful results. We are successful when our clients tell us they can achieve better outcomes.

Filtering by Category: Events

Help us help you

On March 25th, Dan and I participated in the third and final workshop in the “Defense Technology Innovation” series coordinated by the Center for 21st Century Security & Intelligence (21CSI) at the Brookings Institution. At 21CSI, Ian Wallace and Peter Singer are exploring how DoD can better “spin in” information technologies. Representatives from the private, public, and non-profit sectors discussed challenges to effective technology acquisition and opportunities to promote reform. We don’t want to “scoop” Brookings by sharing any of the takeaways in advance of its forthcoming report, but we found the exchange to be encouragingly objective – viewing the issue from the perspective of both industry and government – and grounded in realistic considerations of cost, risk, and potentially conflicting incentives inherent to the acquisition process. We look forward to continuing to work with 21CSI on addressing this persistent challenge.

Scoring policy points

On Friday, I had the privilege of serving as a judge for the Cyber 9/12 Student Challenge, organized by the Brent Scowcroft Center on International Security at the Atlantic Council. More than twenty teams of graduate and undergraduate students specializing in cyber statecraft presented policy options for responding to a fictional cyber attack with global implications. Cyber risk can lead governments into uncharted waters, and provocative exercises like this allow us to explore the potential consequences (both intended and unintended) of state action before crisis hits. To that end, I was impressed by the breadth, depth, and creativity of the competitors' arguments, which reflected a growing academic emphasis on topics relevant to cyber policy. And that is very encouraging.

2019 footer.png